Zika virus: dangerous but still puzzling
by Michael Cook | 17 Dec 2016 |
Nearly half of women infected with the mosquito-borne Zika virus experience some complications with their pregnancy, according to a preliminary study from Brazil. In an article in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine, researchers describe the results of a study of 125 women who displayed symptoms of a Zika virus infection at some stage in their pregnancy. The study is small, but it is the first involving women who clearly had the virus.
The results were alarming: 55% of pregnancies had adverse outcomes after maternal infection in the first trimester, 52% after infection in the second trimester, and 29% after infection in the third trimester. The adverse outcomes include miscarriage, calcifications in a baby’s brain, babies who are smaller than normal, and brain hemorrhages. There were four cases of microcephaly among the 125 infected women, or 3.4%.
Overall, 46% of the pregnancies were problematic – and this may underestimate the impact of the virus, Karin Nielsen-Saines of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, told Science. “Some babies are damaged invisibly at birth, and as they’re supposed to develop the problems will emerge,” she said.
However, the data on Zika is puzzling researchers. Another study published this week in JAMA about women in the US who were infected came to a very different conclusion. Among pregnant women in the United States with completed pregnancies and laboratory evidence of possible recent Zika infection, 6% of fetuses or infants had Zika-associated birth defects.
The stark difference – 46% and 6% --between the two studies does not necessarily mean that they conflict. They were studying different populations of women and babies affected by a disease which is hard to detect and defects which are hard to define. However, the rate of cases of microcephaly in both studies was similar – about 3 or 4%.
Brazil is the country which has reported the highest numbers of Zika-affected microcephalic babies. Scientists wonder whether there may be special conditions which account for this. One possibility is widespread Dengue fever, which is caused by a virus related to Zika. Dengue might protect women – or it might amplify the effect of Zika.
The message, despite the differences, is clear: pregnant women should do all they can to protect themselves against the Zika virus.
All the best to our readers for a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! BioEdge will be taking a break for a while. Our next email will arrive, depending on your time zone, around January 11. We plan to move to a mid-week, rather than a weekend, mail-out.
Quite a few people have responded to our fund-raising campaign. We are very grateful for your support and generosity. The funds will help us to redesign the website in the new year.
|This week in BioEdge|
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016Americans could put pressure on Netherlands and Belgium
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016Not everyone is enthusiastic
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016It expects 20 patients in the first half of the year
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016Confusing reports on his motives in the deaths
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016Two studies with different results
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016Nurses authorised to carry out euthanasia
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016The first successful pregnancy after pre-pubertal freezing of ovarian tissue
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016New Zealand data shows that 80% of social costs are incurred by 20% of the population
by Michael Cook | Dec 17, 2016What we need is a populist bioethics commission, says Wesley Smith
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Email: email@example.comNew Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario