miércoles, 25 de abril de 2018

Emergency department boarding and adverse hospitalization outcomes among patients admitted to a general medical service. - PubMed - NCBI

Emergency department boarding and adverse hospitalization outcomes among patients admitted to a general medical service. - PubMed - NCBI

AHRQ News Now



Study Finds No Link Between Extended Emergency Department Delays and Adverse Patient Outcomes

Emergency department (ED) patients subjected to “boarding” -- holding a patient in the ED for more than 4 hours before hospital admission – were not more likely to experience adverse outcomes than patients who were not boarded, according to an AHRQ-funded study. Researchers examined outcomes of nearly 31,500 patients, including about 4,000 patients who were boarded, at an urban hospital between 2013 and 2015. Boarded patients were no more likely than other patients to experience any of three common adverse outcomes:rapid response team activation, escalation in care or mortality. Access the abstract of the study, published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

 2018 Mar 20. pii: S0735-6757(18)30235-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.043. [Epub ahead of print]

Emergency department boarding and adverse hospitalization outcomes among patients admitted to a general medical service.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) has been associated with patient harm, yet little is known about the association between ED boarding and adverse hospitalization outcomes. We sought to examine the association between ED boarding and three common adverse hospitalization outcomes: rapid response team activation (RRT), escalation in care, and mortality.

METHOD:

We conducted an observational analysis of consecutive patient encounters admitted from the ED to the general medical service between February 2013 and June 2015. This study was conducted in an urban, academic hospital with an annual adult ED census over 90,000. We defined boarding as patients with greater than 4h from ED bed order to ED departure to hospital ward. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse outcomes in the first 24h of admission, including RRT activation, care escalation to intensive care, or in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS:

A total of 31,426 patient encounters were included of which 3978 (12.7%) boarded in the ED for 4h or more. Adverse outcomes occurred in 1.92% of all encounters. Comparing boarded vs. non-boarded patients, 41 (1.03%) vs. 244 (0.90%) patients experienced a RRT activation, 53 (1.33%) vs. 387 (1.42%) experienced a care escalation, and 1 (0.03%) vs.12 (0.04%) experienced unanticipated in-hospital death, within 24h of ED admission. In unadjusted analysis, there was no difference in the composite outcome between boarding and non-boarding patients (1.91% vs. 1.91%, p=0.994). Regression analysis adjusted for patient demographics, acuity, and comorbidities also showed no association between boarding and the primary outcome. A sensitivity analysis showed an association between ED boarding and the composite outcome inclusive of the entire inpatient hospital stay (5.8% vs. 4.7%, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION:

Within the first 24h of hospital admission to a general medicine service, adverse hospitalization outcomes are rare and not associated with ED boarding.

KEYWORDS:

Boarding; Emergency department; Overcrowding

PMID:
 
29605480
 
DOI:
 
10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.043

No hay comentarios: