lunes, 6 de octubre de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Seasonal Alterations in Park Visitation, Amenity Use, and Physical Activity — Grand Forks, North Dakota, 2012–2013 - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Seasonal Alterations in Park Visitation, Amenity Use, and Physical Activity — Grand Forks, North Dakota, 2012–2013 - CDC



Preventing Chronic Disease Logo



Seasonal Alterations in Park Visitation, Amenity Use, and Physical Activity — Grand Forks, North Dakota, 2012–2013

James N. Roemmich, PhD; LuAnn Johnson, MS

Suggested citation for this article: Roemmich JN, Johnson L. Seasonal Alterations in Park Visitation, Amenity Use, and Physical Activity — Grand Forks, North Dakota, 2012–2013. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:140175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140175External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Park amenities promote visitation and physical activity during summer. Physical activity declines during winter. Identifying park amenities that promote visitation during winter would increase year-round activity. The purpose of this study was to determine how park visitation, amenity choice, and physical activity intensity change across seasons.
Methods
Physical activity intensity of children and adults was assessed at 16 parks in Grand Forks, North Dakota, during summer and fall of 2012, and winter and spring of 2013.
Results
Park visitation was highest in spring and lowest in winter. Amenity use varied by season. Parks with water splash pads were visited more during summer, and playgrounds and open spaces were visited more during spring. Ice rinks were visited most in winter. Physical activity intensity was lowest in summer and highest in winter for each age group. The activity intensity observed for all young age groups ranged from 2.7 to 2.9 metabolic equivalents in summer and greater than 3 metabolic equivalents in all other seasons. Adults’ mean activity intensity was greater than 3 metabolic equivalents in winter.
Conclusion
Information on park visitation, amenity use, and activity intensity across seasons is valuable; it can be used when designing or redesigning parks in order to promote year-round physical activity. Redesigning parks in cold climates to include ice rinks, sledding hills, cross-country skiing, and indoor areas for physical activity would increase winter visitation and allow the park to serve as a year-round resource for physical activity.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the material contributions of Joley E. Beeler, BS, to data collection and writing of this manuscript. We thank the Grand Forks Park District for access to the parks. This research was supported by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Agricultural Research Service project USDA 5450-51000-049-00D. The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the USDA or the Agricultural Research Service. The mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the US government. The study sponsor had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: James N. Roemmich, PhD, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58203-9034. Telephone: 701-795-8272. E-mail: james.roemmich@ars.usda.gov.
Author Affiliations: LuAnn Johnson, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Grand Forks, North Dakota.

References



  1. Bauman AE. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7(1, Suppl):6–19. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 2006;174(6):801–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, Raja S, Yin L. The neighborhood and home environments: disparate relationships with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth. Ann Behav Med 2007;33(1):29–38. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, Raja S, Yin L, Robinson J, Winiewicz D. Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Prev Med 2006;43(6):437–41. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Durand CP, Andalib M, Dunton GF, Wolch J, Pentz MA. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes Rev 2011;12(5):e173–82. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Rodríguez DA, Cho GH, Evenson KR, Conway TL, Cohen D, Ghosh-Dastidar B, et al. Out and about: association of the built environment with physical activity behaviors of adolescent females. Health Place 2012;18(1):55–62. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Blanck HM, Allen D, Bashir Z, Gordon N, Goodman A, Merriam D, et al. Let’s go to the park today: the role of parks in obesity prevention and improving the public’s health. Child Obes 2012;8(5):423–8. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Orsega-Smith E, Mowen AJ, Payne LL, Godbey G. The interaction of stress and park use on psycho-physiological health in older adults. J Leis Res 2004;36(2):232–56.
  9. Ulrich RS, Dimberg U, Driver BL. Psycho-physiological indicators of leisure benefits. In: Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL, editors. Benefits of Leisure. State College (PA): Venture Publishing, Inc; 1991. p. 73–89.
  10. Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. Am J Prev Med 2005;28(2, Suppl 2):159–68. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Shores KA, West ST. The relationship between built park environments and physical activity in four park locations. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14(3):e9–16. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  12. Floyd MF, Spengler JO, Maddock JE, Gobster PH, Suau LJ. Park-based physical activity in diverse communities of two U.S. cities: an observational study. Am J Prev Med 2008;34(4):299–305. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Reed JA, Arant CA, Wells P, Stevens K, Hagen S, Harring H. A descriptive examination of the most frequently used activity settings in 25 community parks using direct observation. J Phys Act Health 2008;5(Suppl 1):S183–95. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  14. Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, Derose KP, Martinez H, Setodji C, et al. Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med 2010;50(Suppl 1):S9–12. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Kaczynski AT, Stanis SA, Besenyi GM, Child S. Differences in youth and adult physical activity in park settings by sex and race/ethnicity. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:E42. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Shores KA, West ST. Rural and urban park visits and park-based physical activity. Prev Med 2010;50(Suppl 1):S13–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Ma Y, Olendzki BC, Li WE, Hafner AR, Chiriboga D, Hebert JR, et al. Seasonal variation in food intake, physical activity, and body weight in a predominantly overweight population. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60(4):519–28.
  18. Monthly estimates of leisure-time physical inactivity – United States, 1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46(18):393–7. http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/prevguid/m0047596/m0047596.asp. Accessed December 13, 2013. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for observing play and recreation in communities (SOPARC): reliability and feasibility measures. J Phys Act Health 2006;3(Suppl 1):S208–22. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. McKenzie TL. Observational measures of children’s physical activity. J Sch Health 1991;61(5):224–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25(1):71–80. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  22. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(9, Suppl):S498–504. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  23. Levin S, Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Richardson MT, Leon AS. Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity. Ann Epidemiol 1999;9(8):481–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  24. Pivarnik JM, Reeves MJ, Rafferty AP. Seasonal variation in adult leisure-time physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(6):1004–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  25. Dietz WH Jr, Gortmaker SL. Factors within the physical environment associated with childhood obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;39(4):619–24. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  26. McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place 2010;16(4):712–26. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  27. Loprinzi PD, Lee H, Cardinal BJ. Dose response association between physical activity and biological, demographic, and perceptions of health variables. Obes Facts 2013;6(4):380–92. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  28. Baranowski T, Thompson WO, DuRant RH, Baranowski J, Puhl J. Observations on physical activity in physical locations: age, gender, ethnicity, and month effects. Res Q Exerc Sport 1993;64(2):127–33. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: