Success Stories from the AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture
Tuesday, September 16, 2014,1-2 pm ET
This free Webinar from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) will highlight results from the newly released 2014 Medical Office User Comparative Database Report. Users will share how their organizations have successfully used the AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture and improved their patient safety culture over time.
Speakers:
Theresa Famolaro, MPS, Database Manager, AHRQ Surveys on Patient Safety Culture, Westat, Rockville, MD (Moderator)
Juanita Stroud, Patient Safety Director, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC
Bev Funaro, RN, Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs, Yuma District Hospital and Clinics, Yuma, CO
Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture
2014 User Comparative Database Report
Comparative results are provided for the items and patient safety culture dimensions on the AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture to allow medical offices to compare their survey results against the results from 935 medical offices and 27,103 staff respondents.
Select to download print version (Part 1, PDF File, 2.8 MB; Part 2, PDF File, 1.3 MB).
Prepared for:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
540 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850
http://www.ahrq.gov
Contract No. HHSA 290201300003C
Managed and prepared by:
Westat, Rockville, MD
Joann Sorra, PhD
Theresa Famolaro, MPS.
Naomi Dyer Yount, PhD
Scott Smith, PhD
Willow Burns, MA
Stephen Wilson, MA
Helen Liu
Jianmin Liu, MS
Jafar Haider
Survey Content
Survey Administration Statistics
Characteristics of Participating Medical Offices
Characteristics of Respondents
Areas of Strength for Most Medical Offices
Areas With Potential for Improvement for Most Medical Offices
Results by Medical Office Characteristics
Results by Respondent Characteristics
Action Planning for Improvement
Purpose and Use of This Report
Chapter 1. Introduction
Survey Content
Data Limitations
Chapter 2. Survey Administration Statistics
Chapter 3. Medical Office Characteristics
Number of Providers
Single Specialty vs. Multi-Specialty
Specialty
Implementation of Electronic Tools
Ownership
Geographic Region
Chapter 4. Characteristics of Respondents
Staff Position
Additional Characteristics of Respondents
Chapter 5. Overall Results
Composite and Item-Level Charts
Overall Ratings
Chapter 6. Comparing Your Results
Description of Comparative Statistics
Composite and Item-Level Comparative Tables
Appendixes A and B: Overall Results by Medical Office and Respondent Characteristics
Chapter 7. What’s Next? Action Planning for Improvement
Seven Steps of Action Planning
References
Notes: Description of Data Cleaning and Calculations
Appendixes
Executive Summary
Appendix A—Overall Results by Medical Office Characteristics
Appendix B—Overall Results by Respondent Characteristics
List of Tables
Table 1-1. Patient Safety Culture Composites and Definitions
Table 1-2. Distribution of AHRQ Database Medical Offices (2014) Compared With U.S. Economic Census (2007) and NAMCS (2005-2006) Data by Region
Table 2-1. Overall Response Rate Statistics—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 2-2. Survey Administration Mode Statistics—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 2-3. Average Response Rate by Survey Administration Mode—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-1. Number of Providers: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-2. Single Specialty vs. Multi-Specialty: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-3. Specialty: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-4. Implementation Status of Electronic Tools: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-5. Majority Ownership: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-6. Geographic Region: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices and Respondents
Table 4-1. Staff Position: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Office Respondents
Table 4-2. Tenure in Medical Office: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Office Respondents
Table 4-3. Hours Worked per Week: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Office Respondents
Table 6-1. Interpretation of Percentile Scores
Table 6-2. Sample Percentile Statistics
Table 6-3. Composite-Level Comparative Results—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-4. Item-Level Comparative Results—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-5. Item-Level Comparative Results on Patient Safety and Quality Issues—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-6. Item-Level Comparative Results on Information Exchange With Other Settings—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-7. Comparative Results on Average Overall Ratings on Quality and Patient Safety—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table N1. Example of Computing Item and Composite Percent Positive Scores
Table N2. Data Table for Example of How To Compute Percentiles
List of Charts
Chart 5-1. Composite-Level Average Percent Positive Response—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-2. Item-Level Average Percent Positive Response—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-3. Item-Level Average Ratings on List of Patient Safety and Quality Issues—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-4. Item-Level Average Ratings on Information Exchange With Other Settings—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-5. Item-Level Average Overall Ratings on Quality—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-6. Item-Level Average Overall Rating on Patient Safety—2014 Database Medical Offices
The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without specific permission of copyright holders.
No investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement (e.g., employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in this report.
Select to download print version (Part 1, PDF File, 2.8 MB; Part 2, PDF File, 1.3 MB).
Prepared for:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
540 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850
http://www.ahrq.gov
Contract No. HHSA 290201300003C
Managed and prepared by:
Westat, Rockville, MD
Joann Sorra, PhD
Theresa Famolaro, MPS.
Naomi Dyer Yount, PhD
Scott Smith, PhD
Willow Burns, MA
Stephen Wilson, MA
Helen Liu
Jianmin Liu, MS
Jafar Haider
Contents
Executive SummarySurvey Content
Survey Administration Statistics
Characteristics of Participating Medical Offices
Characteristics of Respondents
Areas of Strength for Most Medical Offices
Areas With Potential for Improvement for Most Medical Offices
Results by Medical Office Characteristics
Results by Respondent Characteristics
Action Planning for Improvement
Purpose and Use of This Report
Chapter 1. Introduction
Survey Content
Data Limitations
Chapter 2. Survey Administration Statistics
Chapter 3. Medical Office Characteristics
Number of Providers
Single Specialty vs. Multi-Specialty
Specialty
Implementation of Electronic Tools
Ownership
Geographic Region
Chapter 4. Characteristics of Respondents
Staff Position
Additional Characteristics of Respondents
Chapter 5. Overall Results
Composite and Item-Level Charts
Overall Ratings
Chapter 6. Comparing Your Results
Description of Comparative Statistics
Composite and Item-Level Comparative Tables
Appendixes A and B: Overall Results by Medical Office and Respondent Characteristics
Chapter 7. What’s Next? Action Planning for Improvement
Seven Steps of Action Planning
References
Notes: Description of Data Cleaning and Calculations
Appendixes
Executive Summary
Appendix A—Overall Results by Medical Office Characteristics
Appendix B—Overall Results by Respondent Characteristics
List of Tables
Table 1-1. Patient Safety Culture Composites and Definitions
Table 1-2. Distribution of AHRQ Database Medical Offices (2014) Compared With U.S. Economic Census (2007) and NAMCS (2005-2006) Data by Region
Table 2-1. Overall Response Rate Statistics—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 2-2. Survey Administration Mode Statistics—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 2-3. Average Response Rate by Survey Administration Mode—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-1. Number of Providers: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-2. Single Specialty vs. Multi-Specialty: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-3. Specialty: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-4. Implementation Status of Electronic Tools: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-5. Majority Ownership: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 3-6. Geographic Region: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Offices and Respondents
Table 4-1. Staff Position: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Office Respondents
Table 4-2. Tenure in Medical Office: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Office Respondents
Table 4-3. Hours Worked per Week: Distribution of 2014 Database Medical Office Respondents
Table 6-1. Interpretation of Percentile Scores
Table 6-2. Sample Percentile Statistics
Table 6-3. Composite-Level Comparative Results—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-4. Item-Level Comparative Results—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-5. Item-Level Comparative Results on Patient Safety and Quality Issues—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-6. Item-Level Comparative Results on Information Exchange With Other Settings—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table 6-7. Comparative Results on Average Overall Ratings on Quality and Patient Safety—2014 Database Medical Offices
Table N1. Example of Computing Item and Composite Percent Positive Scores
Table N2. Data Table for Example of How To Compute Percentiles
List of Charts
Chart 5-1. Composite-Level Average Percent Positive Response—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-2. Item-Level Average Percent Positive Response—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-3. Item-Level Average Ratings on List of Patient Safety and Quality Issues—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-4. Item-Level Average Ratings on Information Exchange With Other Settings—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-5. Item-Level Average Overall Ratings on Quality—2014 Database Medical Offices
Chart 5-6. Item-Level Average Overall Rating on Patient Safety—2014 Database Medical Offices
The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without specific permission of copyright holders.
No investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement (e.g., employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in this report.
Current as of June 2014
Internet Citation: Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2014 User Comparative Database Report. June 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2014/index.html
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario