Preventing Chronic Disease | The Tennessee Department of Health WORKshops on Use of Secondary Data for Community Health Assessment, 2012 - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | The Tennessee Department of Health WORKshops on Use of Secondary Data for Community Health Assessment, 2012 - CDC

The Tennessee Department of Health WORKshops on Use of Secondary Data for Community Health Assessment, 2012

Navigate This Article

• Abstract
• Introduction
• Designing the Elements of the Community Health Assessment
• Workshop Participation, Outcomes, and Evaluation
• Considerations and Challenges
• Acknowledgments
• Author Information
• References
• Tables

Bruce A. Behringer, MPH; Ellen Omohundro, PhD; Derrick Boswell; Dwayne Evans; Lori B. Ferranti, PhD

Suggested citation for this article: Behringer BA, Omohundro E, Boswell D, Evans D, Ferranti LB. The Tennessee Department of Health WORKshops on Use of Secondary Data for Community Health Assessment, 2012. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130206. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130206.

PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Community health assessment is a core function of public health departments, a standard for accreditation of public health departments, and a core competency for public health professionals. The Tennessee Department of Health developed a statewide initiative to improve the processes for engaging county health departments in assessing their community’s health status through the collection and analysis of secondary data. One aim of the Tennessee Department of Health was to position county public health departments as trusted leaders in providing population data and engaging community stakeholders in assessments. The Tennessee Department of Health’s Division of Policy, Planning, and Assessment conducted regional 2-day training workshops to explain and guide completion of computer spreadsheets on 12 health topics. Participants from 93 counties extracted data from multiple and diverse sources to quantify county demographics, health status, and resources and wrote problem statements based on the data examined. The workshops included additional staff development through integration of short lessons on data analysis, epidemiology, and social-behavior theory. Participants reported in post-workshop surveys higher degrees of comfort in interpreting data and writing about their findings on county health issues, and they shared their findings with health, hospital, school, and government leaders (including county health council members) in their counties. Completion of the assessments enabled counties and the Tennessee Department of Health to address performance-improvement goals and assist counties in preparing to meet public health accreditation prerequisites. The methods developed for using secondary data for community health assessment are Tennessee’s first-phase response to counties’ request for a statewide structure for conducting such assessments.

Figure. Baldrige criteria (6). [A text description of this figure is also available.]

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Bruce A. Behringer, MPH, Deputy Commissioner, Continuous Improvement and Training, Tennessee Department of Health, 425 5th Ave North, Nashville, TN 37243. Telephone: 615-741-3111. E-mail: bruce.behringer@tn.gov.

Author Affiliations: Ellen Omohundro, Derrick Boswell, Dwayne Evans, Lori B. Ferranti, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee.

Top of Page

References

1. Institute of Medicine. The future of public health. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1988.
2. Guide to national public health department accreditation, version 1.0. Alexandria (VA): Public Health Accreditation Board; 2011. http://www.phaboard.org/accreditation-process/public-health-department-standards-and-measures/. Accessed August 24, 2013.
3. Core competencies for public health professionals. The Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice. Washington (DC): Public Health Foundation; 2010. http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Documents/Core_Competencies_for_Public_Health_Professionals_2010May.pdf. Accessed May 24, 2013.
4. Notice and request for comments regarding the community health needs assessment requirements for tax-exempt hospitals, notice 2011-52. Washington (DC): Internal Revenue Service, Notice 2011-52; 2011. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-11-52.pdf. Accessed February 7, 2013.
5. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. Health care criteria for performance excellence, 2011-12. Gaithersburg (MD): US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2011.
6. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, 2012, 2013–2014 Criteria for performance excellence. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/business_nonprofit_criteria.cfm. Accessed November 19, 2013.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Public Health Improvement Initiative — Tennessee Department of Health. http://www.cdc.gov/stltpublichealth/NPHII/tennessee/index.html. Accessed December 2, 2013.
8. Erwin PC, Mills VL. Tennessee’s county health councils: partnerships to improve the public’s health. Tenn Med 2012;105(8):45–8. PubMed
9. Ten essential public health services. National Public Health Performance Standards Program. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/essentialservices.html. Accessed February 27, 2013.
10. America’s health rankings. Minnetonka (MN): United Health Foundation; 2012. http://www.americashealthrankings.org/. Accessed February 17, 2013.