sábado, 8 de febrero de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | The Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health Partnership Study: Multisector Partnerships in US Counties with Improving Health Metrics - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | The Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health Partnership Study: Multisector Partnerships in US Counties with Improving Health Metrics - CDC



PCD Logo



The Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health Partnership Study: Multisector Partnerships in US Counties with Improving Health Metrics

Susan J. Zahner, DrPH, MPH, RN; Thomas R. Oliver, PhD, MHA; Kirstin Q. Siemering, DrPH

Suggested citation for this article: Zahner SJ, Oliver TR, Siemering KQ. The Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health Partnership Study: Multisector Partnerships in US Counties with Improving Health Metrics. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130103. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130103External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Multisector partnerships are promoted as a mechanism to improve population health. This study explored the types and salient features of multisector partnerships in US counties with improving population health metrics.
Methods
We used the “Framework for Understanding Cross-Sector Collaborations” proposed by Bryson, Crosby, and Stone to guide data collection and interpretation. Comparative case studies were conducted in 4 counties selected on the basis of population, geographic region, an age-adjusted mortality decline better than the US average, and stable per capita income. Data were collected through website and report reviews and through in-depth interviews with key informants (N = 59) representing multiple sectors. County reports were developed and cross-case themes related to partnership types and salient features were derived.
Results
Multisector collaboration was common in all 4 counties despite substantial variations in population, geographic size, demographic diversity, and other characteristics. Most partnerships were formed by professionals and organizations to improve delivery of health and social services to vulnerable populations or to generate policy, system, and environment changes. Multisector collaboration was valued in all cases. Outcomes attributed to partnerships included short- and long-term effects that contributed to improved population health.
Conclusion
The Bryson, Crosby, and Stone model is a useful framework for conducting case study research on multisector partnerships. Outcomes attributed to the multisector partnerships have the potential to contribute to improvement in population health. Further study is needed to confirm whether multisector partnerships are necessary for improving population health within counties and to understand which partnership characteristics are critical for success.

Author Information

Corresponding author: Susan J. Zahner, DrPH, MPH, RN, Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professor, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin–Madison, H6/240 CSC, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-2455. Telephone: 608-263-5282. Email: sjzahner@wisc.edu
Author Affiliations: Thomas R. Oliver, Kirstin Q. Siemering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

References



  1. Stone D. Policy paradox: the art of political decision making. Revised edition. New York (NY): WW Norton; 2002. p. 354–75.
  2. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health 2000;21:369–402. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Woulfe J, Oliver TR, Zahner SJ, Siemering KQ. Multisector partnerships in population health improvement. Prev Chronic Dis 2010;7(6):A119. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2010/nov/10_0104.htm. Accessed September 17, 2013. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Pub Admin Rev 2006; Special Issue: p. 44–55.
  5. Kindig DA, Booske BC, Siemering KQ, Henry BL, Remington PL. Observations and recommendations from the Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH) expert meeting. Prev Chronic Dis 2010;7(6):A124. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2010/nov/10_0132.htm. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Yin RK. Case study research design and methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
  7. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62(1):107–15. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Butterfoss FD. Coalitions and Partnerships in Community Health. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2007.

No hay comentarios: