sábado, 8 de febrero de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Prevalence of Smoke-Free Car and Home Rules in Maine Before and After Passage of a Smoke-Free Vehicle Law, 2007–2010 - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Prevalence of Smoke-Free Car and Home Rules in Maine Before and After Passage of a Smoke-Free Vehicle Law, 2007–2010 - CDC



PCD Logo

Prevalence of Smoke-Free Car and Home Rules in Maine Before and After Passage of a Smoke-Free Vehicle Law, 2007–2010

Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer, PhD, MPH; Patrick Madden, MS; Dorean Maines, MS; Carol Coles

Suggested citation for this article: Murphy-Hoefer R, Madden P, Maines D, Coles C. Prevalence of Smoke-Free Car and Home Rules in Maine Before and After Passage of a Smoke-Free Vehicle Law, 2007–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130132. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130132External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
This is the first study to examine the prevalence of self-reported smoke-free rules for private cars and homes before and after the passage of a smoke-free vehicle law.
Methods
Data were examined for 13,461 Maine adults aged 18 or older who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based telephone survey covering health topics. Self-reported smoke-free car and home rules, smoking behavior, and demographic variables of age, sex, education, income, and children in household were analyzed for prevalence before and after the state’s smoke-free vehicle law was passed.
Results
Prevalence of smoke-free car and home rules was significantly higher after Maine’s smoke-free vehicle law was passed in the state (P = .004 for car rules and P = .009 for home rules). Variations in smoking rules differed by smoking and demographic variables. People with household incomes of less than $20,000 saw an increase of 14.3% in smoke-free car rules; overall, those with annual incomes of less than $20,000 and those with less than a high school education reported a lower prevalence of smoke-free car rules both before and after the law was passed than did people with higher incomes and higher education levels. The prevalence of smoke-free home rules after the law was implemented was higher among those with 4 or more years of college education than among those with lower levels of education (P = .02).
Conclusion
The prevalence of smoke-free car and home rules among Maine adults was significantly higher after the passage of a statewide smoke-free vehicle law. This apparent change in smoke-free rule prevalence may be indicative of changing social norms related to the unacceptability of secondhand smoke exposure.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Rebecca L. Murphy-Hoefer, PhD, MPH, School of Community and Population Health, University of New England, 716 Stevens Ave, Portland, ME 04103. E-mail: murphy.rebecca@ymail.com.
Author affiliations: Patrick Madden, Market Decisions, Portland, Maine; Dorean Maines, Carol Coles, Partnership for a Tobacco-Free Maine, Augusta, Maine.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke — United States, 1999–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59(35):1141–6. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
  3. Gibbs FA, Tong VT, Farr SL, Dietz PM, Babb S. Smoke-free-home rules among women with infants, 2004–2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:120108. Accessed November 12, 2012. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Weisman SR. Kids, cars and cigarettes: policy options for smoke-free vehicles. St Paul (MN): Public Health Law Center; 2010.
  5. Halterman JS, Fagnano M, Conn KM, Szilagyi PG. Do parents of urban children with persistent asthma ban smoking in their homes and cars? Ambul Pediatr 2006;6(2):115–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Rees VW, Connolly GN. Measuring air quality to protect children from secondhand smoke in cars. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(5):363–8. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Sly PD, Deverell M, Kusel MM, Holt PG. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in cars increases the risk of persistent wheeze in adolescents. Med J Aust 2007;186(6):322. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Sendzik T, Fong G, Travers M, Hyland A. An experimental investigation of tobacco smoke pollution in cars. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11(6):627–34.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Tobacco control state highlights 2012. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2013.
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State smoke-free laws for worksites, restaurants, and bars — United States, 2000–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60(15):472–5. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Healthy Maine Partnerships. Tobacco facts. http://www.healthymainepartnerships.org/documents/TobaccoFacts.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012.
  12. Code of the City of Bangor, Article IX. Sections 291-70 and 291-71.
  13. MRSA 22 § 1549.
  14. Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights. Smokerfree cars. http://www.no-smoke.org/learnmore.php?id=616. Accessed August 3, 2013.
  15. Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Bolen J, Stanwyck CA, Mack KA. Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soz Praventivmed 2001;46(Suppl 1):S3–42. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Anderson S, Fong GT. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii42–50. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Mills AL, White MM, Pierce JP, Messer K. Home smoking bans among U.S. households with children and smokers. Opportunities for intervention. Am J Prev Med 2011;41(6):559–65. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Patel V, Thomson G, Wilson N. Objective measurement of area differences in ‘private’ smoking behaviour: observing smoking in vehicles. Tob Control 2013;22(2):130–5. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Kegler MC, Escoffery C, Butler S. A qualitative study on establishing and enforcing smoking rules in family cars. Nicotine Tob Res 2008;10(3):493–7.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Matt GE, Quintana PJ, Hovell MF, Chatfield D, Ma DS, Romero R, et al. Residual tobacco smoke pollution in used cars for sale: air, dust, and surfaces. Nicotine Tob Res 2008;10(9):1467–75. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Sleimana M, Gundela LA, Pankowb JF, Jacob P, Singera BC, Destaillats H. Formation of carcinogens indoors by surface-mediated reactions of nicotine with nitrous acid, leading to potential thirdhand smoke hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/04/0912820107.full.pdf+html?sid=a9fa8602-2b11-433d-a6cd-173e01d3e409. Accessed November 12, 2012.
  22. Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeill A, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: fındings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii51–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  23. Akhtar PC, Haw SJ, Currie DB, Zachary R, Currie CE. Smoking restrictions in the home and secondhand smoke exposure among primary schoolchildren before and after introduction of the Scottish smoke-free legislation. Tob Control 2009;18(5):409–15. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific prevalence of smoke-free home rules — United States 1992–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56(20):501–4. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  25. Environmental tobacco smoke: a hazard to children. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Pediatrics 1997;99(4):639–42. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  26. Apostolou A, Garcia-Esquinas E, Fadrowski JJ, McClain P, Weaver VM, Navas-Acien A. Secondhand tobacco smoke: a source of lead exposure in US children and adolescents. Am J Public Health 2012;102(4):714–22. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  27. Kabir Z, Connolly GN, Alpert HR. Secondhand smoke exposure and neurobehavioral disorders among children in the United States. Pediatrics 2011;128(2):263–70. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  28. Guilfoyle J. Toll of tobacco in the United States of America. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, 2011. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0072.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2012.
  29. Hyland A, Higbee C, Borland R, Travers MJ, Hastings G, Fong GT, et al. Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11(6):642–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  30. King BA, Dube SR, Homa DM. Smoke-free rules and secondhand smoke exposure in homes and vehicles among US adults, 2009–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:120218. . Accessed May 21, 2013. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  31. Tobacco control state highlights, 2010. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2010.

No hay comentarios: