Preventing Chronic Disease | State Practitioner Insights Into Local Public Health Challenges and Opportunities in Obesity Prevention: a Qualitative Study - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | State Practitioner Insights Into Local Public Health Challenges and Opportunities in Obesity Prevention: a Qualitative Study - CDC

State Practitioner Insights Into Local Public Health Challenges and Opportunities in Obesity Prevention: a Qualitative Study

Navigate This Article

• Abstract
• Introduction
• Methods
• Results
• Discussion
• Acknowledgments
• Author Information
• References
• Table
• Appendix

Katherine A. Stamatakis, PhD, MPH; Moira Lewis, MPH; Elaine C. Khoong; Claire LaSee, MPH, MSW

Suggested citation for this article: Stamatakis KA, Lewis M, Khoong EC, LaSee C. State Practitioner Insights Into Local Public Health Challenges and Opportunities in Obesity Prevention: a Qualitative Study. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130260. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130260.

PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
The extent of obesity prevention activities conducted by local health departments (LHDs) varies widely. The purpose of this qualitative study was to characterize how state obesity prevention program directors perceived the role of LHDs in obesity prevention and factors that impact LHDs’ success in obesity prevention.

Methods
From June 2011 through August 2011, we conducted 28 semistructured interviews with directors of federally funded obesity prevention programs at 22 state and regional health departments. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed to identify recurring themes and key quotations.

Results
Main themes focused on the roles of LHDs in local policy and environmental change and on the barriers and facilitators to LHD success. The role LHDs play in obesity prevention varied across states but generally reflected governance structure (decentralized vs centralized). Barriers to local prevention efforts included competing priorities, lack of local capacity, siloed public health structures, and a lack of local engagement in policy and environmental change. Structures and processes that facilitated prevention were having state support (eg, resources, technical assistance), dedicated staff, strong communication networks, and a robust community health assessment and planning process.

Conclusions
These findings provide insight into successful strategies state and local practitioners are using to implement innovative (and evidence-informed) community-based interventions. The change in the nature of obesity prevention requires a rethinking of the state–local relationship, especially in centralized states.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Katherine A. Stamatakis, PhD, MPH, Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110. Telephone: 314-977-5508. E-mail: kstamata@slu.edu.

Author Affiliations: Moira Lewis, Elaine C. Khoong, Washington University School of Medicine and the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Missouri; Claire LaSee, Washington State Department of Health, Tumwater, Washington.

Top of Page

References

1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS data brief 2012;(82):1-8.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated county-level prevalence of diabetes and obesity — United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58(45):1259–63. PubMed
3. Stamatakis KA, Leatherdale ST, Marx CM, Yan Y, Colditz GA, Brownson RC. Where is obesity prevention on the map?: distribution and predictors of local health department prevention activities in relation to county-level obesity prevalence in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract 2012;18(5):402–11. CrossRef PubMed
4. Healthy people 2010 final review. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
5. Slater SJ, Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ. Missed opportunities: local health departments as providers of obesity prevention programs for adolescents. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(4, Suppl):S246–50. CrossRef PubMed
6. 2005 National profile of local health departments. Washington (DC): National Association of County and City Health Officials; 2006.
7. Chen Z, Roy K, Gotway-Crawford CA. Obesity prevention: the impact of local health departments. Health Serv Res 2013;48(2pt1):603–27. CrossRef PubMed
8. CDC Healthy Communities Program — ACHIEVE communities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/healthycommunitiesprogram/communities/achieve/index.htm.
9. Program areas — childhood obesity. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2013. http://www.rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/program-areas/childhood-obesity.html.
10. Sallis JF, Cervero R, Ascher W, Henderson K, Kraft J, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 2006;27:297–322. CrossRef PubMed
11. Story M, Kaphingst K, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:253–72. CrossRef PubMed
12. Huang TT, Drewnowski A, Kumanyika S, Glass T. A systems-oriented multilevel framework for addressing obesity in the 21st century. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6(3):A82. PubMed
13. Institute of Medicine. The future of the public’s health in the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2002.
14. Institute of Medicine. Local government actions to prevent childhood obesity. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.
15. Brownson RC, Ballew P, Brown KL, Elliott MB, Haire-Joshu D, Heath GW, et al. The effect of disseminating evidence-based interventions that promote physical activity to health departments. Am J Public Health 2007;97(10):1900–7. CrossRef PubMed
16. Obesity and overweight for professionals. State programs: funded states. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/stateprograms/fundedstates.html. Accessed January 22, 2014.
17. Thomas D. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 2006;27:237. CrossRef
18. Burla L, Knierim B, Barth J, Liewald K, Duetz M, Abel T. From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nurs Res 2008;57(2):113–7. CrossRef PubMed
19. Profile of state public health. Arlington (VA): Association of State and Territorial Health Officials; 2011.
20. Zaza S, Briss PA, Harris KW, editors. The Guide to community preventive services: what works to promote health? New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2005.
21. Khan LK, Sobush K, Keener D, Goodman K, Lowry A, Kakietek J, et al. Recommended community strategies and measurements to prevent obesity in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2009;58(RR-7):1–26. PubMed
22. Leadership for health communities advancing policies to support healthy eating and active living: action strategies toolkit. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2009.
23. Schwarte L, Samuels SE, Boyle M, Clark SE, Flores G, Prentice B. Local public health departments in California: changing nutrition and physical activity environments for obesity prevention. J Public Health Manag Pract 2010;16(2):E17–28. CrossRef PubMed
24. Changes in size of local health department workforce: Longitudianl analysis of 2008 and 2010 profile data. Washington (DC): National Association of County and City Health Officials; 2011.
25. Changes in local health department services and activities: longitudinal analysis of 2008 and 2010 profile data. Washington (DC): National Association of County and City Health Officials; 2012.
26. Harris JK, Mueller NL. Policy activity and policy adoption in rural, suburban, and urban local health departments. J Public Health Manag Pract 2013;19(2):E1–8. CrossRef PubMed
27. Harris JK. Communication ties across the national network of local health departments. Am J Prev Med 2013;44(3):247–53. CrossRef PubMed
28. Brownson RC, Allen P, Duggan K, Stamatakis KA, Erwin PC. Fostering more-effective public health by identifying administrative evidence-based practices: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(3):309–19. CrossRef PubMed
29. National public health accreditation prerequisites. Alexandria (VA): Public Health Accreditation Board; 2012.
30. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50. CrossRef PubMed