Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J. Crit Care. 2015;19:254.
This meta-analysis of rapid response systems concludes that despite the heterogeneity of included populations and varying study designs, rapid response teams do improve in-hospital mortality for pediatric and adult populations. This analysis supports the current widespread implementation of rapid response.
PubMed citation
Available at
Free full text (PDF)
Related Resources
REVIEW
Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward.Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:667-79.
Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward.Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:667-79.
REVIEW
Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence.Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47:237-256.
Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence.Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47:237-256.
BOOK/REPORT
Safer Clinical Systems: Evaluation Findings.Dixon-Woods M, Martin G, Tarrant C, et al. London, UK: Health Foundation; December 2014.
Safer Clinical Systems: Evaluation Findings.Dixon-Woods M, Martin G, Tarrant C, et al. London, UK: Health Foundation; December 2014.
COMMENTARY
Equipped: overcoming barriers to change to improve quality of care (theories of change).Lachman P, Runnacles J, Dudley J; RCPCH Clinical Standards Committee. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100:13-18.
View all related resources...
Equipped: overcoming barriers to change to improve quality of care (theories of change).Lachman P, Runnacles J, Dudley J; RCPCH Clinical Standards Committee. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100:13-18.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario