miércoles, 7 de enero de 2015

Preventing Chronic Disease | Healthy Kids Out of School: Using Mixed Methods to Develop Principles for Promoting Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Out-of-School Settings in the United States - CDC

FULL-TEXT ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Healthy Kids Out of School: Using Mixed Methods to Develop Principles for Promoting Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Out-of-School Settings in the United States - CDC



Preventing Chronic Disease Logo



A Healthy New Year

Photo of an e-card

Start the New Year off right by making sure you’re prepared to fight the flu in 2015. The CDC recommends everyone 6 months of age and older get a flu vaccine. Share this e-card for more flu-related tips.

Healthy Kids Out of School: Using Mixed Methods to Develop Principles for Promoting Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Out-of-School Settings in the United States

Sarah A. Sliwa, PhD; Shanti Sharma, PhD; William H. Dietz, MD, PhD; Peter R. Dolan, MBA; Miriam E. Nelson, PhD; Molly B. Newman, MS, RD; Maya Rockeymoore, PhD; Christina D. Economos, PhD

Suggested citation for this article: Sliwa SA, Sharma S, Dietz WH, Dolan PR, Nelson ME, Newman MB, et al. Healthy Kids Out of School: Using Mixed Methods to Develop Principles for Promoting Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Out-of-School Settings in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:140207. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140207External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Widespread practices supporting availability of healthful foods, beverages, and physical activity in out-of-school-time (OST) settings would further obesity prevention efforts. The objective of this article was to describe principles to guide policy development in support of healthy eating and physical activity practices in out-of-school settings to promote obesity prevention.
Methods
The Institute of Medicine’s L.E.A.D. framework (Locate Evidence, Evaluate it, Assemble it, and Inform Decisions) was used to identify practices relevant to children’s healthful eating in most OST settings: 1) locate and evaluate information from a national survey of children’s perceptions of healthful-food access; published research, reports, policies and guidelines; and roundtables with OST organizations’ administrators; 2) assemble information to prioritize actionable practices; and 3) inform programmatic direction.
Results
Three evidence-informed guiding principles for short-duration OST resulted: 1) drink right: choose water instead of sugar-sweetened beverages; 2) move more: boost movement and physical activity in all programs; and 3) snack smart: fuel up on fruits and vegetables.
Conclusion
Healthy Kids Out of School was launched to support the dissemination and implementation of these guiding principles in short-duration OST settings, complementing efforts in other OST settings to shift norms around eating and physical activity.

Introduction

Strategies to accelerate obesity prevention include modifying environments where children spend time in order to increase their opportunities for healthful eating and physical activity (1). Children’s consumption of fruits and vegetables (2) and their levels of physical activity continue to fall short of recommendations (3). Given their broad demographic reach and contact time with children, out-of-school time (OST) programs are well suited to improve children’s access to healthful foods and beverages and increase opportunities for physical activity (4–6). Consistent policies may help (4).
OST environments include before-school, after-school, and summer programs, which together engage millions of children, including large numbers of minority youths (7) who are at greater risk for obesity (8). These settings vary in their operational structures, leadership, and contact hours with children; they include long-duration after-school programs (which are typically operated 5 days per week for more than 3 hours a day by paid staff) and short-duration programs (which are often led by parents or unpaid volunteers, including youth sports and Scouts).
The Healthy Out-of-School Time Coalition developed voluntary standards for healthful eating and physical activity, which were adopted by the National Afterschool Association (9,10). The standards include 11 overarching guidelines and supporting standards that are well-suited for programs with established training opportunities. However, short-duration OST programs, especially those led by volunteers, have limited training opportunities. These programs would benefit from complementary standards that are easy to understand and implement.
This article describes the process used to identify, develop, and support the implementation of principles to improve children’s energy balance in short-duration OST settings. Mixed methods allowed researchers to integrate quantitative and qualitative data to quantify the reach of OST programs, policies, and guidelines and to engage stakeholders in prioritizing and tailoring a response.
The Tufts University institutional review board reviewed and approved this research.

Acknowledgments

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The JPB Foundation provide strategic funding for ChildObesity180. The HKOS initiative in Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire is supported by the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation. The authors thank Katie Smith for graphics and statistical support.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Sarah A. Sliwa, PhD, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111. Telephone: 617-636-3547. E-mail: sarah.sliwa@tufts.edu
Author Affiliations: Shanti Sharma, Peter R. Dolan, Molly B. Newman, Miriam E. Nelson, Christina D. Economos, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; William H. Dietz, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, and George Washington University, Washington, DC; Maya Rockeymoore, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, and Global Policy Solutions, Washington DC.

References



  1. Glickman DL, Sim LJ, Del Valle Cook H, Ann Miller E, editors. Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: solving the weight of the nation. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2012. 1-16,154, 442.
  2. Kim SA, Moore LV, Galuska D, Wright AP, Harris D, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. Vital signs: fruit and vegetable intake among children — United States, 2003–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63(31):671–6. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Gortmaker SL, Lee R, Cradock AL, Sobol AM, Duncan DT, Wang YC. Disparities in youth physical activity in the United States: 2003–2006. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44(5):888–93. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Beets MW, Tilley F, Kim Y, Webster C. Nutritional policies and standards for snacks served in after-school programmes: a review. Public Health Nutr 2011;14(10):1882–90. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin HE, Huberty JL. After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2009;36(6):527–37. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. National Physical Activity Plan. National physical activity plan for the United States; 2010. http://www.physicalactivityplan.org/NationalPhysicalActivityPlan.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2010.
  7. Afterschool Alliance, JC Penney Afterschool. America after 3pm: the most in-depth study of how America’s children spend their afternoons; 2009. http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AA3PM_National_2009.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2010.
  8. Singh GK, Kogan MD, van Dyck PC. A multilevel analysis of state and regional disparities in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States. J Community Health 2008;33(2):90–102. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Wiecha JL, Hall G, Gannett E, Roth B. Development of healthy eating and physical activity quality standards for out-of-school time programs. Child Obes 2012;8(6):572–6. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Wiecha J, Hall G, Roth B. National Afterschool Association standards for healthy eating and physical activity in out-of-school time programs; 2011. Accessed December 13, 2013. http://www.niost.org/pdf/host/Healthy_Eating_and_Physical_Activity_Standards.pdf
  11. Kumanyika K, Parker L, Sim LS, editors. Bridging the evidence gap in obesity prevention: a framework to inform decision making. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2010. 336p.
  12. Economos CD, Bakun PJ, Herzog JB, Dolan PR, Lynskey VM, Markow D, et al. Children's perceptions of weight, obesity, nutrition, physical activity and related health and socio-behavioural factors. Public Health Nutr 2014;17(1):170–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Krueger RA, Casey MA, Kumar A. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2008. p.113-128.
  14. Mozaffarian RS, Andry A, Lee RM, Wiecha JL, Gortmaker SL. Price and healthfulness of snacks in 32 YMCA after-school programs in 4 US metropolitan areas, 2006-2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E38. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Hastmann TJ, Bopp M, Fallon EA, Rosenkranz RR, Dzewaltowski DA. Factors influencing the implementation of organized physical activity and fruit and vegetable snacks in the HOP'N After-School Obesity Prevention Program. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45(1):60–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Mozaffarian RS, Wiecha JL, Roth BA, Nelson TF, Lee RM, Gortmaker SL. Impact of an organizational intervention designed to improve snack and beverage quality in YMCA after-school programs. Am J Public Health 2010;100(5):925–32. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Gortmaker SL, Lee RM, Mozafarrian RS, Sobol AM, Nelson TF, Roth BA, et al. Effect of an after-school intervention on increases in children’s physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44(3):450–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Rosenkranz RR, Behrens TK, Dzewaltowski DA. A group-randomized controlled trial for health promotion in Girl Scouts: Healthier Troops in a SNAP (Scouting Nutrition & Activity Program). BMC Public Health 2010;10(81):1–13. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Jago R, Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, Thompson D, Cullen KW, Watson K, et al. Fit for Life Boy Scout badge: outcome evaluation of a troop and Internet intervention. Prev Med 2006;42(3):181–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Thompson D, Baronowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen K, Jago R, Watson K, et al. Boy Scout 5-a-Day Badge: outcome results of a troop and Internet intervention. Prev Med 2009;49(6):518–26. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Report on trends and participation in organized youth sports: market research report. Stuart (FL): National Council on Youth Sports; 2008. http://www.ncys.org/pdfs/2008/2008-ncys-market-research-report.pdf. Accessed Decem ber 11, 2014.
  22. Overview of Boy Scouts of America. Boys Scouts of America; 2013. http://www.scouting.org/About/FactSheets/OverviewofBSA.aspx. Accessed December 13, 2013.
  23. About Girl Scouts of the USA. Girl Scouts of America; 2013. http://www.girlscouts.org/who_we_are/facts/pdf/facts_gs.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2013.
  24. ChildObesity180 nutrition and physical activity goals. Boston (MA): ChildObesity180; 2013. http://www.childobesity180.org/sites/default/files/documents/ChildObesity180%20Nutrition%20and%20Physical%20Activity%20Goals.pdf#sthash.9vFQHduE.dpuf. Accessed March 27, 2014.
  25. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89(9):1322–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: