Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods.
Carter JL, Coletti RJ, Harris RP. BMJ. 2015;350:g7773.
Seeking to identify the best strategies for accurately quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis over time, this systematic review examined studies that measured overdiagnosis rates for nine common cancers. The authors concluded that ecological and cohort studies led by unbiased researchers show the most promise for monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening programs.
PubMed citation
Free full text
Related Resources
COMMENTARY
Epidemiology of medical error.Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.
Epidemiology of medical error.Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.
COMMENTARY
As she lay dying: how I fought to stop medical errors from killing my mom.Welch JR. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:2817-2820.
As she lay dying: how I fought to stop medical errors from killing my mom.Welch JR. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:2817-2820.
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY/GUIDELINES
ACOG Committee Opinion #546: tracking and reminder systems.ACOG Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1535-1537.
ACOG Committee Opinion #546: tracking and reminder systems.ACOG Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1535-1537.
STUDY
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection.Wolf JA, Moreau J, Akilov O, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:422-426.
View all related resources...
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection.Wolf JA, Moreau J, Akilov O, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:422-426.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario