domingo, 28 de mayo de 2017

BioEdge: ‘Existential distress’ drives MAiD requests: Canadian study BioEdge |Sunday, May 28, 2017 | BioEdge |

BioEdge: ‘Existential distress’ drives MAiD requests: Canadian study

BioEdge |Sunday, May 28, 2017 | BioEdge |



‘Existential distress’ drives MAiD requests: Canadian study
     
The debate over euthanasia is often framed in terms of unbearable pain. Yet a new review of assisted dying cases in Toronto suggests that patients are primarily concerned about a “loss of control” over their lives, rather than refractory pain symptoms.

The study, published in the current edition of the New England Journal of Medicine, reviewed data on assisted dying cases from the University Hospital Network (UNH), an Ontario healthcare and medical research organisation that operates four major hospitals in the Toronto area.

According the researchers, the primary reason why UNH patients requested assisted dying was to relieve “existential distress”. The review states:

“Those who received MAiD tended to be white and relatively affluent and indicated that loss of autonomy was the primary reason for their request. Other common reasons included the wish to avoid burdening others or losing dignity and the intolerability of not being able to enjoy one’s life. Few patients cited inadequate control of pain or other symptoms.”
According to Madeline Li, the principal author of the study, patients primarily wanted control over how their lives will end: “Their quality of life is not what they want.” Li told the Washington Post. “They are mostly educated and affluent — people who are used to being successful and in control of their lives, and it’s how they want their death to be”.

Similar findings have been reported in studies of US and European data.

In a recent article in the Medical Journal of Australia, American bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel argued that the presence of existential distress in assisted dying cases counts as a reason not to legalise euthanasia:

“What is then the great impetus to legalise interventions to end lives for a small minority of patients who are depressed, worried about losing autonomy and being tired of life? We should end the focus on the media frenzy about euthanasia and PAS as if it were the panacea to improving end-of-life care.”




Bioedge

Sunday, May 28, 2017

I can't say that I agree with Nietzsche on everything, but he was onto something when he wrote, "what does not kill a database makes it stronger". 

We were hit by a bug over the weekend and this mini-Götterdämmerung  has delayed the newsletter. But soon, touch wood, it will be stronger than ever. Thanks, Friedrich. 



Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge

NEWS THIS WEEK
 
by Xavier Symons | May 28, 2017
Patients tended to be white and relatively affluent and loss of autonomy was the primary motivation
 
by Xavier Symons | May 28, 2017
Corbyn back-pedals on abortion in Northern Ireland
 
by Xavier Symons | May 28, 2017
'The reviewers were amazingly encouraging, giving us very high marks in nearly every category'
 
by Xavier Symons | May 28, 2017
Opposition to euthanasia is still strong
 
by Michael Cook | May 28, 2017
Is it corruption or a recognition of their dignity?
 
by Michael Cook | May 28, 2017
A way to control dissidents
 
by Michael Cook | May 28, 2017
The technology is unethical because it supports the false belief that genetic links are essential
 
by Michael Cook | May 28, 2017
Genene Jones will probably spend life behind bars
IN DEPTH THIS WEEK
 
by Craig Klugman | May 26, 2017
The last bioethics advisory body ended in January 2017
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios: