domingo, 6 de abril de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Restaurant Owners’ Perspectives on a Voluntary Program to Recognize Restaurants for Offering Reduced-Size Portions, Los Angeles County, 2012 - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Restaurant Owners’ Perspectives on a Voluntary Program to Recognize Restaurants for Offering Reduced-Size Portions, Los Angeles County, 2012 - CDC



Preventing Chronic Disease Logo

Image of eCard



Restaurant Owners’ Perspectives on a Voluntary Program to Recognize Restaurants for Offering Reduced-Size Portions, Los Angeles County, 2012

Lauren Gase, MPH; Lauren Dunning, JD, MPH; Tony Kuo, MD, MSHS; Paul Simon, MD, MPH; Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH

Suggested citation for this article: Gase L, Dunning L, Kuo T, Simon P, Fielding JE. Restaurant Owners’ Perspectives on a Voluntary Program to Recognize Restaurants for Offering Reduced-Size Portions, Los Angeles County, 2012. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130310. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130310External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Reducing the portion size of food and beverages served at restaurants has emerged as a strategy for addressing the obesity epidemic; however, barriers and facilitators to achieving this goal are not well characterized.
Methods
In fall 2012, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health conducted semistructured interviews with restaurant owners to better understand contextual factors that may impede or facilitate participation in a voluntary program to recognize restaurants for offering reduced-size portions.
Results
Interviews were completed with 18 restaurant owners (representing nearly 350 restaurants). Analyses of qualitative data revealed 6 themes related to portion size: 1) perceived customer demand is central to menu planning; 2) multiple portion sizes are already being offered for at least some food items; 3) numerous logistical barriers exist for offering reduced-size portions; 4) restaurant owners have concerns about potential revenue losses from offering reduced-size portions; 5) healthful eating is the responsibility of the customer; and 6) a few owners want to be socially responsible industry leaders.
Conclusion
A program to recognize restaurants for offering reduced-size portions may be a feasible approach in Los Angeles County. These findings may have applications for jurisdictions interested in engaging restaurants as partners in reducing the obesity epidemic.


Author Information

Corresponding Author: Lauren Gase, MPH, Program Manager, Health and Policy Assessment, Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 3530 Wilshire Blvd, 8th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90010. Telephone: 213-427-4409. E-mail:lgase@ph.lacounty.gov.
Author Affiliations: Lauren Dunning, Tony Kuo, Paul Simon, Jonathan E. Fielding, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.

References

  1. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288(14):1728–32. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288(14):1723–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal K. Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief 2012;(82):1–8. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Lin B, Frazão E, Futhrie J. Away-from-home foods increasingly important to quality of American diet. Agriculture Information Bulletin no. 749. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture; 1999.
  5. Lin B, Morrison RM. Food and nutrient intake data: taking a look at the nutritional quality of foods eaten at home and away from home. Amber Waves 2012;10(2):1–8.
  6. Okrent AM, Alston JM. The demand for disaggregated food-away-from-home and food-at-home products in the United States. Economic Research Report no. 69. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture; 2012.
  7. Young LR, Nestle M. The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health 2002;92(2):246–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Young LR, Nestle M. Reducing portion size to prevent obesity: a call to action. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(5):565–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Duffey KJ, Popkin BM. Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977–2006. PLoS Med 2011;8(6):e1001050. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. iexclPor Vida! — San Antonio’s Healthy Menu Initiative. San Antonio (TX): City of San Antonio Metropolitan Health District; 2013. http://www.porvidasa.com/. Accessed February 10, 2014.
  11. Heart-Check meal certification program. Dallas (TX): American Heart Association; 2103. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/GettingHealthy/NutritionCenter/DiningOut/Heart-Check-Meal-Certification-Program-Foodservice_UCM_441027_Article.jsp. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  12. Economos CD, Folta SC, Goldberg J, Hudson D, Collins J, Baker Z, et al. A community-based restaurant initiative to increase availability of healthy menu options in Somerville, Massachusetts: Shape Up Somerville. Prev Chronic Dis 2009:6(3):A102. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/Jul/08_0165.htm. Accessed April 11, 2013. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. F.I.T. City initiative. Chicago (IL): Building a healthier Chicago. http://www.healthierchicago.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={7A3D070B-E6C5-4BA9-9A1F-4756DAD5685E}. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  14. Hanni KD, Garcia E, Ellemberg C, Winkleby M. Targeting the taqueria: implementing healthy food options at Mexican American restaurants. Health Promot Pract 2009;10(2 Suppl):91S–9S. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Acharya RN, Patterson PM, Hill EP, Schmitz TG, Bohm E. An evaluation of the “TrEAT Yourself Well” restaurant nutrition campaign. Health Educ Behav 2006;33(3):309–24. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Schwartz J, Riis J, Elbel B, Ariely D. Inviting consumers to downsize fast-food portions significantly reduces calorie consumption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(2):399–407. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Condrasky M, Ledikwe JH, Flood JE, Rolls BJ. Chefs’ opinions of restaurant portion sizes. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15(8):2086–94. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Harris JE, Gleason PM, Sheean PM, Boushey C, Beto JA, Bruemmer B. An introduction to qualitative research for food and nutrition professionals. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109(1):80–90. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Gase LN, Kuo T, Dunet DO, Simon PA. Facilitators and barriers to implementing a local policy to reduce sodium consumption in the County of Los Angeles government, California, 2009. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(2):A33. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2011/mar/10_0060.htm. Accessed April 11, 2013. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Glanz K, Resnicow K, Seymour J, Hoy K, Stewart H, Lyons M, et al. How major restaurant chains plan their menus: the role of profit, demand, and health. Am J Prev Med 2007;32(5):383–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Kelso A. NRA: consumers want local sourcing and healthy menu choices. Louisville (KY): Networld Media Group; 2012. http://www.qsrweb.com/article/189903/NRA-Consumers-want-local-sourcing-and-healthy-menu-choices. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  22. Cardello H. Better-for-you foods: it’s just good business. Washington (DC): Hudson Institute; 2011. http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=8423. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  23. Just DR, Wansink B. One man’s tall is another man’s small: how the framing of portion size influences food choice. Health Econ 2013. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: