Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency |
A Guide for HospitalsResearch suggests that adverse events affect patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) more frequently, are often caused by communication problems, and are more likely to result in serious harm compared to those that affect English-speaking patients. This guide focuses on how hospitals can better identify, report, monitor, and prevent medical errors in patients with LEP. Prepared by: The Disparities Solutions Center, Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA and Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA under Contract No. HHSA290200600011I. The authors of this guide are responsible for its content. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Statements in the guide should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Select for print version (PDF File, 9.4 MB; Plugin Software Help). ContentsAcknowledgmentsForeword About This Guide Goal of the Hospital Guide Target Audience Organization of the Guide Executive Summary What We Know About Safety and Limited English Proficiency Why Focus on LEP and Patient Safety? Common Causes of Adverse Events for LEP and Culturally Diverse Patients Systems and Strategies To Improve Safety for LEP Patients Specific Recommendations for High-Risk Scenarios Improving Team Communication To Foster Safety for LEP Patients: TeamSTEPPS® LEP Module Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Chapter 1: Background on Patient Safety and LEP Populations What We Know About Safety and Limited-English-Proficient Patients What We Know About Hospitals’ Response to LEP Patient Safety Why Hospitals Should Focus on Patient Safety for LEP Populations Common Causes of Adverse Events for LEP and Culturally Diverse Patients High-Risk Scenarios Chapter 2: Five Key Recommendations To Improve Patient Safety for LEP Patients Foster a Supportive Culture for Safety of Diverse Patient Populations Adapt Current Systems To Better Identify Medical Errors Among Patients with LEP Improve Reporting of Medical Errors for LEP Patients Routinely Monitor Patient Safety for LEP Patients Address Root Causes To Prevent Medical Errors Among LEP Patients Chapter 3: Improving Team Communication To Foster Safety for LEP Patients: TeamSTEPPS LEP Module Background on TeamSTEPPS and the TeamSTEPPS LEP Module TeamSTEPPS Module Content: Team Behaviors To Improve LEP Patient Safety Summary of TeamSTEPPS LEP Module References Appendixes Appendix A: Recommendations for Staff Training Appendix B: Bringing It To Life - Case Study Appendix C: Advisory Board Members Appendix D: Methods Appendix E: Resources and Tools To Address Language and Cultural Barriers and Improve Patient Safety Appendix F: PowerPoint Presentation: Executive Summary AcknowledgmentsImproving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Guide for Hospitals is the product of collaboration between the Disparities Solutions Center, Mongan Institute for Health Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital, Abt Associates, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).Many individuals contributed to the development of this guide, including hospital leaders and frontline staff who agreed to be interviewed as part of this project, as well as our Advisory Board. Their participation, expertise, and support have been a great help. Specifically, we thank:
This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without specific permission of copyright holders. ForewordThe landmark Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human was an influential and transformative call to action, urging our health care system to ensure that patients not be harmed by care that is intended to help them. This led to a national effort in patient safety that was deep and broad and remains both a key pillar of quality and an essential aim of effective health care delivery. Although the principles of patient safety and the science of preventing medical errors have evolved and advanced over the years, recent evidence tells us that for minority patients and patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) we may be falling well short of our goals.Research suggests that adverse events affect LEP patients more frequently, are often caused by communication problems, and are more likely to result in serious harm compared to those that affect English-speaking patients. Effective provider-patient communication is vital, especially in areas as critical as medication reconciliation, hospital discharge, informed consent, and surgical care (pre-, peri-, and post-op), to name a few. In fact, these communication-sensitive processes don’t just put patients with LEP at risk. Patients with limited health literacy, those who may be affected by disabilities, and those who are subject to other vulnerabilities face an increased risk of misunderstanding and, in turn, medical errors. The Joint Commission recently developed a new set of standards on Patient-Centered Communication that emphasize the importance of focusing on LEP, cultural competency, and patient-centered care in all aspects of quality. Starting this year, hospitals seeking accreditation will be expected to comply with these recommendations. As hospitals prepare for these standards and work to better ensure equity in patient safety, they will look for resources in this critical area of patient safety. Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Guide for Hospitals and its companion TeamSTEPPS® LEP Training Module are two such resources—one focused on how hospitals can better identify, report, monitor, and prevent medical errors in patients with LEP; the other a training module that teaches a set of team behaviors and structured communication tools designed to reduce medical errors for LEP patients. Built on solid research and well-tested patient safety methodology, these tools provide the case for why this field is important, as well as the basic strategies necessary to build safety systems that truly protect all patients, especially the most vulnerable. The guide and TeamSTEPPS module are practical, actionable, and respectful of competing priorities. They provide a menu of activities to choose from that can immediately be integrated in a broader set of patient safety activities. Recently the American Hospital Association stood with the Association of American Medical Colleges, American College of Healthcare Executives, Catholic Health Association of the United States, and National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems in a call to action to eliminate health care disparities. I’m hoping you will join me and other leaders across the country who are striving to meet the challenge of achieving equity and ensuring safe, high-quality care for all we serve and think that this guide will be an important tool for your organization in that journey. Rich Umbdenstock President and CEO American Hospital Association
AHRQ Publication No. 12-0041
Current as of September 2012
Internet Citation:
Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficency: A Guide For Hospitals. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0041, September 2012, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/populations/lepguide/
|
martes, 9 de octubre de 2012
Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Guide for Hospitals
Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Guide for Hospitals
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario