GESTIÓN EN SALUD PÚBLICA: BioEdge: Assisted suicide narrowly defeated in South Australia

domingo, 20 de noviembre de 2016

BioEdge: Assisted suicide narrowly defeated in South Australia

BioEdge: Assisted suicide narrowly defeated in South Australia
Bioedge

Assisted suicide narrowly defeated in South Australia

by Michael Cook | 20 Nov 2016 |

Assisted suicide was defeated by the narrowest of margins in the state of South Australia this week – for the 15^th time. After a marathon debating the issue, the MPs were split, 23 against the Death with Dignity Bill, and 23 in favour. The speaker of the House cast a deciding vote against it at 4am.
Although South Australia is geographically remote from high-profile battles over end-of-life issues, the debate there was followed closely by the world media and was reported in the New York Times, The Economist, the Washington Post and the Guardian. If it had cleared the hurdles there, assisted suicide would probably have been legalized in Australia’s other states. The result may have had some influence in the debate in Washington DC, where the City Council has voted 11-2 to legalise it. But after being signed by the mayor, it still needs to be approved by Congress. With Republicans now controlling the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate, this is hardly certain.
MPs in Adelaide, the state capital, were expected to pass the bill after intense lobbying by Andrew Denton, a well-known comedian, TV presenter and radio who has made assisted suicide a personal crusade. But it seems that the dangers of authorizing a doctor to kill another person worried wavering legislators.
Within hours of the failure of the bill in South Australia, former Premier Lara Giddings introduced the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2016 into Tasmania’s lower house, although it is unlikely to be debated until next March.
"The problem is not going away and the members of the house are kidding themselves if they think they've killed it off," Andrew Denton told AAP. "There is no cure for cancer, there is no cure for motor neuron disease, there is no cure for multiple sclerosis. All those people who are facing painful deaths are still going to be facing those painful deaths."

- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/assisted-suicide-narrowly-defeated-in-south-australia/12099#sthash.lM1MxH1e.dpuf

In 2005 Peter Singer confidently forecast the demise of the "sanctity of life" by 2040. His objections to the idea were mainly philosophical, but he cited two piece of evidence. One was the amazing success of a South Korean scientist named Hwang Woo-suk in creating embryonic stem cell lines. The other was the continuing advance of legal assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Within months, Hwang Woo-suk was exposed as one of the greatest scientific frauds of the last century. As for euthanasia, Singer could still be right (although fears do persist that it could become, in his words, a "holocaust)". One out of two is not an impressive result and does little to inspire confidence in his prediction.

But there is another problem with Singer's critique of the sanctity of life argument, as we report this week. A British bioethicist, David Albert Jones, director of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre, points out that it was not Christians who "invented" the sanctity of life, but Singer and his cronies. In a very thought-provoking article in The New Bioethics, he says that "sanctity of life" is just a straw man set up to label discredit arguments against Singer's "quality of life" approach. It is a controversial thesis which deserves to be debated.