miércoles, 2 de noviembre de 2016

MercatorNet: Euthanasia releases me but betrays my loved ones

MercatorNet: Euthanasia releases me but betrays my loved ones

Euthanasia releases me but betrays my loved ones



Euthanasia releases me but betrays my loved ones

What about euthanasia survivors? Who will listen to them?
Aubert Martin | Nov 2 2016 | comment 1 

Recently, a lady told me that she had just lost her brother who died suddenly, three days after a fall on the sidewalk. Unfortunately, the circumstances of his death leave some doubt as to the exact cause of death. Is it due to his cancer, discovered a few days earlier? Is it related to his psychiatric problems? Is it a case of “strongly encouraged” euthanasia?
The lady has a lot of questions, but no answer will be given. Indeed, despite her legitimate doubts, nobody is able to enlighten or reassure her.
On one hand, Quebec’s College of Physicians asked not to include "medical aid in dying" on the death certificates of patients. Instead, doctors must identify the main disease of the deceased. Therefore, it is impossible, for those who survive the deceased, to find a paper trail if euthanasia is the actual cause of death.
On the other hand, the lady has been given the answer that her brother being dead, there is nothing they can do for her. This is the uncompromising truth of death: it is irreversible.
Thus, survivors like this lady find themselves left behind. Alone in their grief. They are set aside to preserve the supreme principle of the autonomy of individuals.
In legalizing euthanasia, society has crowned the splendor of individualism in balancing the weight of two pains: the suffering of an individual versus the suffering of their relatives. They have decreed that the suffering of relatives should not be considered in calculating the benefit of euthanasia.
To reinforce this point, the flattering and illusory portrait presented to the public always depicts the same picture: a family and an entourage who fully agree with the decision of their relative’s wish to die, and a medical team in total harmony with the family.
Of course, the reality is much more nuanced, and suffering is so much more widespread than the rosy photoshops offered by the promoters of euthanasia.
Imagine that your father was euthanized by a doctor without you having been consulted – as recommended by the law – and perhaps even without you being able to say one last goodbye. How would you feel: grateful or betrayed? How would you see this doctor who gave death to your father without consulting his own children? How would you mourn your father knowing he preferred the advice of two random doctors who judged, after meeting him briefly, that they approved of his desire to die?
The reality is that we may praise euthanasia with soft, buttered words, we may celebrate those who die with champagne and selfies, there will always be people who will have in their heart a painful sense of betrayal after the voluntary death of their relative.
But from now on, they will have to keep their pain to themselves until the end of their lives, since medical suicide is, more than ever, presented as the ideal way to die. Unfortunately, the story of the lady who lost her brother whom she loved so much illustrates the suffering that can result from euthanasia.
And it brings out a troubling question: where is the suffering of the relatives in the new equation of compassion?    
Aubert Martin is the Executive Director of Vivre dans la Dignité (Living with Dignity), a Quebec-based organisation. This article has been republished from its blog.


MercatorNet

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

MercatorNet



Even if you do not live in the United States, the race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is sparking intense and often shrill arguments. I think that a lot of people can't wait for next Wednesday, when the result will (hopefully) be known and peace will descend upon the land -- for a while. The arguments also provoke a question which has often perplexed me: why do people with similar philosophies so often come to different conclusions when it comes time to cast a vote? 
In today's lead article, Zac Alstin attributes this difference of perception to the Four Temperaments, the ancient division of personality types. It's a very thought-provoking essay. He concludes:
When we assume that everyone shares the same basic worldview we end up frustrated at other people’s intransigence or inconsistency, their passivity or their audacity, their seriousness or their flippancy. But if we can understand the radical differences in our basic worldview we are immediately better able to get along with one another, and appreciate the strengths each temperament brings to the whole community.


Michael Cook 
Editor 
MERCATORNET

How we vote: the difference temperament makes
By Zac Alstin
Why do we find it so hard to understand our friends' choices?
Read the full article
 
The elections you probably never heard about
By Dovilas Petkus
Lithuania votes for family values and economic socialism.
Read the full article
 
Euthanasia releases me but betrays my loved ones
By Aubert Martin
What about euthanasia survivors? Who will listen to them?
Read the full article
 
Why don’t we work longer?
By Marcus Roberts
Can we afford to pay pensions from the age of 60?
Read the full article
 
Horse captures cattle rustlers
By Jennifer Minicus
A lesser-known book by a renowned author
Read the full article
 
Election 2016, one week out
By Sheila Liaugminas
How to summarize?
Read the full article
 
How a reforming pope can help heal the Reformation rift
By Austen Ivereigh
The visit of Pope Francis to Sweden is a sign of a slow thaw in relations with Lutherans
Read the full article
 
‘Peer review’, a buzzword in deep trouble
By Donna Laframboise
Medical research, psychology, and economics are all in the grip of a 'reproducibility crisis'
Read the full article


MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

MercatorNet: Euthanasia releases me but betrays my loved ones