lunes, 7 de noviembre de 2016

MercatorNet: Powerful financial interests involved in UK pre-natal testing

MercatorNet: Powerful financial interests involved in UK pre-natal testing



Powerful financial interests involved in UK pre-natal testing

90% of Down syndrome babies are aborted. A new test will increase this.
Peter Saunders | Nov 7 2016 | comment 


The UK government has approved a new test for pregnant women that will make it much easier to detect and search out any babies with Down’s Syndrome (DS).
According to the BBC, the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) will be rolled out by the NHS from 2018.
NIPT involves taking a sample of blood from the pregnant woman which is then examined for abnormal fetal DNA. It is called “non-invasive” because it doesn’t involve “invading” the mother’s womb. It therefore carries no risk of miscarrying a “normal” pregnancy.
It is claimed that NIPT will cut the number of women who need invasive tests like amniocentesis and chorion villus biopsy, which carry a 1-2 percent risk of miscarriage.
The move to make NIPT available on the NHS is extremely controversial and has led to the launch of the “Don’t screen us out” campaign (DSUO). DSUO describes itself “as a grass-roots initiative supported by a collection of people with Down’s syndrome, families and Down’s Syndrome advocate groups led by Saving Downs Syndrome“.
They say that, given the fact that 90 percent of babies who are prenatally diagnosed with Down’s syndrome are currently aborted, the result will be “a profound increase in the number of children with Down’s syndrome screened out by termination”.
new study published in the British Medical Journal on 4 July 2016 backs up their concerns.
The lead author, Professor Lyn Chitty, and her colleagues calculate that in an annual screening population of 698,500, offering NIPT (as a contingent test to women with a Down’s syndrome screening risk of at least 1/150) would increase detection by 195 cases with 3,368 fewer invasive tests but, crucially, only 17 fewer procedure related miscarriages.
If rolling out NIPT will result in 195 more babies with Down’s syndrome being detected, then assuming that 90 percent will then be aborted (the standard quoted figure), that means almost 180 more abortions for Down’s syndrome each year.
Last year there were 3,213 babies with disabilities aborted in this country, over 1,000 of them more than halfway through pregnancy. Of these, 689 had Down’s syndrome.
Sally Phillips drew attention to the issue dramatically in a BBC documentary “A World Without Down’s Syndrome”, which aired on October 5. The programme understandably prompted fierce debate.
At the weekend, 279 medical professionals signed a letter accusing the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) of “advocating that women with a prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome should end their pregnancy”. They said: “We utterly reject the implicit premise that the value of a human being is based on their economic contribution to society.” (see full text here)
The move to introduce NIPT into the National Health Service (NHS) is also backed by powerful commercial interests.
One of the National Screening Committee stakeholders (reviewing and recommending implementation of these tests) is Antenatal Results and Choices (ARC). ARC is probably the best known charity offering advice on screening, where many women go for “non-directive information and support”.
However ARC has just announced a corporate partnership with a US company called Natera, one of the leading suppliers of the UK screening test (marketed as “Panorama”). This is an addition to their “partnership” with at least seven other providers of screening tests!
In other words, regularly advising the Government’s National Screening Committee, and thus government policy, is an organisation that is financially partnered with, and inextricably linked to, all the main providers of the very tests they are pushing to implement! (more here)
The test manufacturers must be delighted to have such good access to the “review” process.
In March 2015 the St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust revealed that it was joining forces with the British firm Premaitha Health to bring in this new screening test. Premaitha, which describes the test (marketed as “Iona”) as its “flagship product”, along with its shareholders, now stands to make a lot of money. Millions of pounds in fact.  Each NIPT test costs between £400 and £900 pounds. Do the maths!
Premaitha admitted this much in a press release earlier this year: “Premaitha anticipates that the endorsement by the NHS will accelerate private payer market growth in the UK”. More importantly, it will put them in pole position to pitch for NHS hospital tenders.
On October 27 at its AGM the company was even bolder. Non-executive Chairman Adam Reynolds, claimed that “the international landscape for non-invasive prenatal testing is evolving very considerably in Premaitha’s favour”. He added that the company was “exceptionally well placed to win significant market share as awareness of the availability of NIPT increases”.
Premaitha has “absolutely no doubt that the developed world is moving” towards “widescale adoption of NIPT” and that it “is well placed to gain a large share of the market”.
So here we have it – a global drama involving pregnant women anxious about having disabled children, campaigners concerned about the eradication of people with disabilities, millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money, biotechnology companies hungry for profits and salivating shareholders seeking a quick buck.
Caught in this toxic web of vested interests, the real victims in this whole drama are babies with a common genetic abnormality whose eradication will lift a perceived burden from some and make others very rich indeed.
The real test of an administration is in what it values – and in particular how it treats the most vulnerable members of society, especially when it costs something emotionally and financially to do so.
The British government, by this reckoning, is not heading in a good direction. But disabled people and their families will not go quietly and I suspect we have not heard the last of this.
Dr Peter Saunders is Chief Executive the Christian Medical Fellowship in the UK and was formerly a general surgeon. He also serves on the boards of the International Christian Medical and Dental Association and Coalition for Marriage and is campaign director for the Care Not Killing Alliance. This article has been republished with permission from the CMF blog.




MercatorNet

For most of us the reproductive technology of Brave New World is just entertaining science fiction. For Alana Newman, it is her life story. In today's lead article she describes what it feels like to be fatherless. It's a very powerful read:
When answering the oh-so-important-for-identity question, Where do I come from? Is that answer humiliating? Some of us come from slaves. Others come from criminals. And some of us come from—sperm donor beach bums. People behave better when they respect themselves. And it’s easier to do that when we can respect the people we come from.
PLEASE NOTE: A gremlin invaded our system at the last minute and made it impossible to upload images. The links below work, but the stories do not appear on the home page. We hope that this will be fixed ASAP. 


Michael Cook
Editor
MERCATORNET



The overwhelming power of small things
By Karl D. Stephan
Household devices connected to the internet are responsible for a gigantic attack on major websites
Read the full article
Connecting
 
 
Powerful financial interests involved in UK pre-natal testing
By Peter Saunders
90% of Down syndrome babies are aborted. A new test will increase this.
Read the full article
 
 
 
The overlooked fatherless: one donor-conceived woman’s story
By Alana S. Newman
Children need to know and be known by their natural mother and father.
Read the full article
 
 
 
Conversations unplugged
By Juliana Weber
We have to learn again how to talk to one another, says Sherry Turkle.
Read the full article
 
 
Births outside marriage decline in U.S.
By Shannon Roberts
The trend is largely due to higher immigrant births.
Read the full article
 
 
Calling all electors: throw the election to the House, and you just might save our country
By Graham Walker
Pre-empting the perennial danger of demagogy.
Read the full article
 
 
Despotism
By J. Budziszewski
What happens when a state tries to govern too many things.
Read the full article
 
 
The first statistics for Quebec’s euthanasia are available—and scary
By Paul Russell
There were nearly three times the number of expected deaths
Read the full article
 
 
Who is behind America’s After-School Satan clubs?
By Massimo Introvigne
The sinister initiative is a ploy to remove Christianity from schools.
Read the full article
 
 
More on China’s marriage problems
By Marcus Roberts
And the role of cultural norms in creating them.
Read the full article
 
 
Cutting out the middleman
By Ronnie Smith
Has Trump's campaign been nothing more than building an audience for 'Trump TV'?
Read the full article
 
 
Housework is the fountain of youth
By Joanna Roughton
A large Dutch study finds it can add years to your life.
Read the full article


MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605

MercatorNet: Powerful financial interests involved in UK pre-natal testing