martes, 22 de noviembre de 2016

MercatorNet: What happens when those who care support killing?

MercatorNet: What happens when those who care support killing?
What happens when those who care support killing?

What happens when those who care support killing?

A union for Australian nurses is backing euthanasia
Greg Donnelly | Nov 22 2016 | comment 

Whenever a poll is taken asking people to identify which profession they trust the most, nursing invariably is listed at the top or very near the top. I cannot remember it being otherwise.
Nurses are head and shoulders above everybody else because of the devotion, skill and care that they show towards patients. They do not do their work for money or glamour or fame. They do it only for the satisfaction that comes from giving your all to look after and support another human being in need.
All of us know what I am talking about. We know because we have personally had the experience of being looked after by a nurse at some stage during our life. Alternatively, we may have observed a family member or friend being given that support and care coming from someone who is not just doing a job, but fulfilling a personal vocation.
And if asked what makes nurses so special, most will answer by saying that they accept us for who we are without any conditions. Above all, they can be trusted to help us in our hour of need. They look after and guide us and protect us from being harmed or perhaps from harming others. That trust is the invisible golden thread that connects patient and nurse. It is special, profoundly human and must never be compromised or betrayed.
For this reason, it is so deeply troubling to see the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (SA Branch) enthusiastically support euthanasia in South Australia. While I have high regard for the way the union represents the workplace interests of nurses and midwives, its highly partisan involvement in the political debate over legalising euthanasia is causing great unease amongst its members and within the community at large. Moreover, what is particularly disturbing is that the union’s leadership seems absolutely determined to ignore and dismiss concerns out of hand.
Lest there be any doubt about the jaundiced approach being taken by the union, visit the websiteof the Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federation (SA Branch) and read the associated articles, media releases and posts and watch the videos.
To start with, the union speaks with great enthusiasm about partnering with media personality, Andrew Denton and his organisation Go Gentle Australia. They are unequivocally committed to passing euthanasia legislation. Achieving this outcome is seen as a political objective that requires the execution of a political campaign.
However, the question is on what basis does the union believe it has the authority to pursue legislative change that would legalise the act of one human being killing, or being party to killing another human being?
It is interesting to note that the union, at least in some of its branches, is giving Andrew Denton complete carte blanche to proselytise his views. In one recent branch journal he was given two full pages to run-out his pro-euthanasia line. In the follow-up edition of the journal, all the letters to the editor were predictably favourable to the Denton line. No alternative view, no dissent, just slavish repetition of Denton’s lines.
Of particular concern also is the “whatever it takes” approach taken by the union on euthanasia legislation. On the very day the South Australian Parliament defeated the Death with Dignity Bill 2016, the union, on its website, was still championing people to back without qualification the Voluntary Euthanasia Bill 2016 that had been introduced into the House of Assembly in February this year. This is both extraordinary and troubling. While politicians, from all parties, had walked away from the Voluntary Euthanasia Bill 2016 because it was so manifestly flawed, here we have the union urging support for it. Even though dangerous loopholes and shortcomings had been identified and placed on the public record, the union was parroting the lines being used by Andrew Denton and Go Gentle Australia.
While this does not appear to bother the union’s leadership, there can be no doubt that many of its members find this situation unbelievable. How can the union leadership be enthusiastically supporting proposed laws that elected representatives have already rejected because of their deficiencies?
Debate in Australia on euthanasia will no doubt continue. Our legislatures are the places where these debates will be undertaken. It will be interesting to see how members of the Nurses and Midwifery Federation react in due course, when they come to realise what is being promoted and supported in their name.
I fear, along with many others, that the impeccable reputation of nurses and their standing in the community is going to be greatly damaged by their union’s one-sided political campaign on euthanasia. Such an outcome will be tragic.
Greg Donnelly is a Labor member of the New South Wales Legislative Council. Contact him atgreg.donnelly@parliament.nsw.gov.au

MercatorNet
I am a bit puzzled by the horrified gasps of journalists at the rise of “post-truth” politics in the era of Donald Trump. Perhaps these guys skipped their lectures at college. For the past 30 or 40 years, post-truth philosophy has been the received Gospel in the humanities. “Truth is what your contemporaries let you get away with,” said the grand old man of American relativism, the philosopher Richard Rorty, a familiar contributor to the New York Times. He was only half-joking. There was no such thing as truth – only democratic consensus.
So after a generation of toxic philosophy, why is anyone surprised that we are on the brink of a generation of toxic politics? Hasn’t the media ever heard of the notion that ideas have consequences? Andrew Calcutt does a good job of describing how intellectuals sold off the family silver in an article below

Michael Cook 
Editor 
MERCATORNET

Do sex education programs work? No, says major new study
By Philippa Taylor
Reviews of world-wide research show that it does not reduce teen pregnancy rates or STI rates.
Read the full article
 
The Accountant
By Laura Cotta Ramosino
'Beautiful Mind' meets action movie in an entertaining but cartoonish plot.
Read the full article
 
The surprising origins of ‘post-truth’ – and how it was spawned by the liberal left
By Andrew Calcutt
The groundbreaking work on “post-truth” was performed by academics 30 years ago
Read the full article
 
What happens when those who care support killing?
By Greg Donnelly
A union for Australian nurses is backing euthanasia
Read the full article
 
This book is sure to become a bedtime favorite
By Jennifer Minicus
An adorable story about a child's evening routine
Read the full article
 
Are children really better off with working mums?
By Joanna Roughton
Advocacy research wants mums at work, regardless.
Read the full article
 
The seven deadly sins of social media
By Heather Zeiger
Tinder is lust. Netflix is sloth ... and it all adds up to idolatry.
Read the full article
 
Why is there something rather than nothing?
By Lloyd Strickland
A philosopher who died 300 years ago was the first to ask this question, apparently.
Read the full article
 
U.S. divorce rate at 35 year low and more births within marriage
By Shannon Roberts
The latest positive U.S. family statistics.
Read the full article
 
Goodbye, Good Reading Guide - and thanks for the ride
By Harley J. Sims
An Australian online venture is, sadly, forced to fold its tent.
Read the full article
 
British adoption case to be reviewed
By Carolyn Moynihan
The social worker's initial rejection of the foster parents was 'wrong'.
Read the full article

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston
New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605